Skip to content
Methodology · MATCH_PILOT_METHODOLOGY_V1

How AnswerSignal separates observation, measurement quality and change.

The public methodology explains what AnswerSignal measures, when data is comparable and which claims it deliberately does not make. Updated 10 September 2026.

ANSWER SIGNALMeasurement confidence
Reviewed questions
Separate systems4
Comparable waves7
Visible quality
Evidence before assertion
24 Discovery questions6 Brand questions7 full measurements
A buyer question flows through four AI answer surfaces to sources, publisher surfaces and neutral brand and competitor signals connected by evidence relationships.
AI discovery is not one ranking, but a system of answers, sources and recommendations.
01
Question set

24 neutral Discovery and 6 Brand Understanding questions.

Discovery questions test visibility across real purchase, provider and problem-solving intents without naming the brand. Brand Understanding questions test how accurately and consistently AI systems understand the business.

02
Human Review

Questions are reviewed, then frozen.

A person assesses relevance, neutrality and business value. Official measurement starts only with exactly 30 accepted questions in a versioned, frozen set.

03
Sentinel intents

Five reference intents monitor measurement stability.

Selected neutral questions cover core intents. They support methodology stability without artificially expanding the official visibility metric.

04
Full Measurements

Seven full measurements across four systems.

Each full measurement runs the same approved question version separately through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. Provider retries do not count as additional full measurements.

05
Measurement Quality

Provider failure is not zero visibility.

AnswerSignal reports completeness, coverage, provider status and comparability. Missing answers remain missing evidence. They never reduce brand visibility artificially.

06
Comparability

Only like-for-like measurements are compared.

Comparison requires the same question version, sufficient provider coverage, complete processing and correct time order. Historical measurements remain immutable snapshots.

07
Recommendation Eligibility

Recommendations require evidence and relevance.

A recommendation is eligible only with complete, same-version, comparable evidence, sufficient measurement quality and a traceable business rationale. It is not tied to a fixed Wave.

08
First remeasurement

Observed change follows documented implementation.

Only a later comparable full measurement after approval and documented implementation can show what changed.

09
Persistence

A further measurement checks persistence.

An initial positive signal may be temporary. Persistence asks whether the observed change remains in a later comparable measurement.

10
Shadow Research

Research stays outside official client measurement.

Where used, Shadow Research explores variants and robustness separately from official full measurements. It changes no client metric and never appears as an extra Wave.

11
Limitations

What AnswerSignal does not prove.

AnswerSignal does not prove causal impact from one action, future rankings, revenue or stable answers from every AI system. It observes change under documented conditions and labels uncertainty.

  • No ranking or revenue guarantee
  • No blending of provider failures with visibility
  • No automatic website changes
  • Search Console and GA4 as optional context only
Next step

Start with a controlled 30-day pilot.

Reviewed questions, four separate AI systems and evidence through remeasurement.

Explore the pilot